Bossy Pants?
Speaker: The Speaker is once again Charles Blow. He once seems to not like society very much, because he pins another problem with it to his resume. He definitely values equality as all the article I have looked at have been between genders or races.
Occasion: The immediate occasion seems to be the Susan Patton’s absurd comments over how women should marry early to be able to compete with other women. Though, the larger occasion seems to be the evolving ideals of gender and how society treats them.
Audience: The audience seems to be more towards our parents and teachers who have control over our children and how they express themselves. Since he is calling for action to be employed on letting children be themselves rather than making them succumb to society ideals.
Purpose: The purpose is definitely direct toward the society to rid of the ideals that are beginning to engulf us. He seems to despise how society is driving Americans as young boys and girls to act how society defines masculinity and femininity. He definitely wants society to change this to let children to be more creative and who they are no matter how society defines them.
Subject: The subject is the problem with society and how it persuades genders of how they should be, rather than expressing themselves.
Tone: The tone is very bitter. He seems to be frustrated with how society is developing, and he definitely leaves a condescending feeling about it. At times he seems pessimistic as he describes how the treatment of kids is teaching them how conform to the ideals of the society.
The specific audience of this article was definitely parents, and teachers, or others that deal with our young children in this society. He wants them to realize how children are conforming to their gender by society ideals instead of expressing themselves. By doing this, he calls out those who deal with young children, such as parents or teachers, to let the individual to express themselves. In addition, I feel as if he is speaking to the middle to upper class, because he gives the sense that these decisions need to be made more often in those classics. He definitely also adds a democratic side by arguing for abortions. Blow definitely delivers this message to both men and women to persuade them to treat both genders by not the ideals of society, but through themselves.
Speaker: The Speaker is once again Charles Blow. He once seems to not like society very much, because he pins another problem with it to his resume. He definitely values equality as all the article I have looked at have been between genders or races.
Occasion: The immediate occasion seems to be the Susan Patton’s absurd comments over how women should marry early to be able to compete with other women. Though, the larger occasion seems to be the evolving ideals of gender and how society treats them.
Audience: The audience seems to be more towards our parents and teachers who have control over our children and how they express themselves. Since he is calling for action to be employed on letting children be themselves rather than making them succumb to society ideals.
Purpose: The purpose is definitely direct toward the society to rid of the ideals that are beginning to engulf us. He seems to despise how society is driving Americans as young boys and girls to act how society defines masculinity and femininity. He definitely wants society to change this to let children to be more creative and who they are no matter how society defines them.
Subject: The subject is the problem with society and how it persuades genders of how they should be, rather than expressing themselves.
Tone: The tone is very bitter. He seems to be frustrated with how society is developing, and he definitely leaves a condescending feeling about it. At times he seems pessimistic as he describes how the treatment of kids is teaching them how conform to the ideals of the society.
The specific audience of this article was definitely parents, and teachers, or others that deal with our young children in this society. He wants them to realize how children are conforming to their gender by society ideals instead of expressing themselves. By doing this, he calls out those who deal with young children, such as parents or teachers, to let the individual to express themselves. In addition, I feel as if he is speaking to the middle to upper class, because he gives the sense that these decisions need to be made more often in those classics. He definitely also adds a democratic side by arguing for abortions. Blow definitely delivers this message to both men and women to persuade them to treat both genders by not the ideals of society, but through themselves.